Standards for the care of people with cystic fibrosis; establishing and maintaining health.

This is the second in a series of four papers updating the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) standards for the care of people with CF. This paper focuses on establishing and maintaining health. The guidance is produced using an evidence-based framework and with wide stakeholder engagement, including people from the CF community. Authors provided a narrative description of their topic and statements, which were more directive. These statements were reviewed by a Delphi exercise, achieving good levels of agreement from a wide group for all statements. This guidance reinforces the importance of a multi-disciplinary CF team, but also describes developing models of care including virtual consultations. The framework for health is reinforced, including the need for a physically active lifestyle and the strict avoidance of all recreational inhalations, including e-cigarettes. Progress with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy is reviewed, including emerging adverse events and advice for dose reduction and interruption. This paper contains guidance that is pertinent to all people with CF regardless of age and eligibility for and access to modulator therapy.

Understanding and addressing the needs of people with cystic fibrosis in the era of CFTR modulator therapy.

Cystic fibrosis is a multiorgan disease caused by impaired function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Since the introduction of the CFTR modulator combination elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), which acts directly on mutant CFTR to enhance its activity, most people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) have seen pronounced reductions in symptoms, and studies project marked increases in life expectancy for pwCF who are eligible for ETI. However, modulator therapy has not cured cystic fibrosis and the success of CFTR modulators has resulted in immediate questions about the new state of cystic fibrosis disease and clinical challenges in the care of pwCF. In this Series paper, we summarise key questions about cystic fibrosis disease in the era of modulator therapy, highlighting state-of-the-art research and clinical practices, knowledge gaps, new challenges faced by pwCF and the potential for future health-care challenges, and the pressing need for additional therapies to treat the underlying genetic or molecular causes of cystic fibrosis.

Advancing the pipeline of cystic fibrosis clinical trials: a new roadmap with a global trial network perspective.

The growing use of modulator therapies aimed at restoring cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein function in people with cystic fibrosis has fundamentally altered clinical trial strategies needed to advance new therapeutics across an orphan disease population that is now divided by CFTR modulator eligibility. The development of a robust pipeline of nucleic acid-based therapies (NABTs)-initially directed towards the estimated 10% of the cystic fibrosis population who are genetically ineligible for, or intolerant of, CFTR modulators-is dependent on the optimisation of restricted trial participant resources across multiple development programmes, a challenge that will preclude the use of gold standard placebo-controlled trials. Advancement of a full pipeline of symptomatic therapies across the entire cystic fibrosis population will be challenged by smaller effect sizes and uncertainty regarding their clinical importance in a growing modulator-treated population with more mild and stable pulmonary disease. In this Series paper, we aim to lay the foundation for clinical trial strategy and community partnership that must deviate from established and familiar precedent to advance the future pipeline of cystic fibrosis therapeutics.

Cystic fibrosis.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease caused by variants in the gene encoding for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. CFTR dysfunction results in abnormal chloride and bicarbonate transport in epithelial cells, leading to a multiorgan disease dominated by respiratory and digestive manifestations. The respiratory disease, which is characterized by airway mucus plugging, chronic bacterial infection and progressive development of bronchiectasis, may lead to chronic respiratory failure, which is the main cause of premature death in people with CF. Over the past 50 years, major progress has been obtained by implementing multidisciplinary care, including nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and antibiotics in specialized CF centers. The past 10 years have further seen the progressive development of oral medications, called CFTR modulators, that partially restore ion transport and lead to a major improvement in clinical manifestations and lung function, presumably resulting in longer survival. Although an increasing proportion of people with CF are being treated with CFTR modulators, challenges remain regarding access to CFTR modulators due to their high cost, and their lack of marketing approval and/or effectiveness in people with rare CFTR variants. The anticipated increase in the number of adults with CF and their aging also challenge the current organization of CF care. The purpose of this review article is to describe current status and future perspective of CF disease and care.

Non-respiratory health-related quality of life in people with cystic fibrosis receiving elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was shown to be safe and efficacious in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function mutation (F/MF) or homozygous for F508del (F/F) in two pivotal Phase 3 trials, significantly improving percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised, Respiratory Domain (CFQ-R RD) scores, and sweat chloride concentration. Here, we analyzed the 11 non-respiratory domains (non-RDs) of the CFQ-R, which assess general health-related quality of life (i.e., Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions, Emotional Functioning, and Social Functioning) and quality of life impacted by CF (i.e., Body Image, Eating Problems, Treatment Burden, Weight, and Digestive Symptoms), for participants in these two Phase 3 trials. ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment led to higher scores in all CFQ-R non-RDs, with improvements in most domains compared with control treatments. These findings demonstrate that ELX/TEZ/IVA improves a range of CF-specific symptoms and general functioning and well-being.

Distal Lung Inflammation Assessed by Alveolar Concentration of Nitric Oxide Is an Individualised Biomarker of Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.

Pulmonary sequelae as assessed by pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are often reported in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 during the post-COVID-19 period. Little is known, however, about the status of pulmonary inflammation during clinical recovery after patients' discharge from the hospitals. We prospectively measured PFTs coupled with the exhaled nitric oxide (NO) stemming from the proximal airways (FeNO) and the distal lung (CaNO) in 169 consecutive patients with varying degrees of the severity of COVID-19 six weeks to one year after acute infection by SARS-CoV-2. The proportions of patients with abnormal PFTs, defined as the presence of either obstructive/restrictive patterns or impaired lung gas transfer, or both, increased with the severity of the initial lung disease (15, 30, and 52% in patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19). FeNO values remained within normal ranges and did not differ between the three groups of patients. CaNO, however, was significantly higher in patients with severe or critical COVID-19, compared with patients with milder forms of the disease. There was also an inverse relationship between CaNO and DLCO. We conclude that the residual inflammation of the distal lung is still present in the post-COVID-19 follow-up period, in particular, in those patients with an initially severe form of COVID-19. This long-lasting alveolar inflammation might contribute to the long-term development of pulmonary fibrosis and warrants the regular monitoring of exhaled NO together with PFTs in patients with COVID-19.

Emerging medicines to improve the basic defect in cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a severe autosomal recessive disorder featuring exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and bronchiectasis. It is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) encoding the CFTR protein, which is an anion channel. CF treatment has long been based only on intensive symptomatic treatment. During the last 10 years, new drugs called CFTR modulators aiming at restoring the CFTR protein function have become available, and they will benefit around 80% of patients with CF. However, more than 10% of CFTR mutations do not produce any CFTR protein for CFTR modulators to act upon. AREAS COVERED: The development of CFTR modulators and their effectiveness in patients with CF will be reviewed. Then, the different strategies to treat patients bearing mutations non-responsive to CFTR modulators will be covered. They comprise DNA- and RNA-based therapies, readthrough agents for nonsense mutations, and cell-based therapies. EXPERT OPINION: CF disease has changed tremendously since the advent of CFTR modulators. For mutations that are not amenable to CFTR modulators, new approaches that are being developed benefit from advances in molecular therapy, but many challenges will have to be solved before they can be safely translated to patients.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled ENaC inhibitor BI 1265162 in patients with cystic fibrosis: BALANCE-CF 1, a randomised, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in cystic fibrosis (CF) airways provides a mutation-agnostic approach that could improve mucociliary clearance in all CF patients. BI 1265162 is an ENaC inhibitor with demonstrated pre-clinical efficacy and safety already demonstrated in humans. OBJECTIVE: We present results from BALANCE-CFTM 1, a phase II, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind study of four dose levels of BI 1265162 versus placebo for 4 weeks on top of standard of care in adults and adolescents with CF. RESULTS: Initially, 28 randomised subjects (BI 1265162 200 µg twice daily n=14, placebo twice daily n=14) were assessed at an interim futility analysis. Compared with placebo, numerical changes of -0.8% (95% CI -6.6 to 4.9%) in percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1s (ppFEV1) and +2.1 units (95% CI -2.4 to 6.5 units) in lung clearance index (LCI) were observed in the active group, meeting a pre-defined stopping rule; accordingly, the study was terminated. Recruitment had continued during the interim analysis and pending results; 24 patients were added across three dose levels and placebo. The final results including these patients (+1.5% ppFEV1, 200 µg twice-daily dose versus placebo) were not supportive of relevant clinical effect. Furthermore, LCI change was not supportive, although interpretation was limited due to insufficient traces meeting quality criteria. A 9.4-point improvement in the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire - Revised Respiratory Domain was observed in the 200 µg twice daily dose group versus placebo. BI 1265162 up to 200 µg twice daily was safe and well-tolerated. Pharmacokinetics were similar to those in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: BI 1265162 was safe, but did not demonstrate a potential for clinical benefit. Development has been terminated.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of Roscovitine (Seliciclib) in cystic fibrosis patients chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The orally available kinase inhibitor R-roscovitine has undergone clinical trials against various cancers and is currently under clinical evaluation against Cushing disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Roscovitine displays biological properties suggesting potential benefits in CF: it partially corrects F508del-CFTR trafficking, stimulates the bactericidal properties of CF alveolar macrophages, and displays anti-inflammatory properties and analgesic effects. METHODS: A phase 2 trial study (ROSCO-CF) was launched to evaluate the safety and effects of roscovitine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected adult CF patients carrying two CF causing mutations (at least one F508del-CFTR mutation) and harboring a FEV1 ≥40%. ROSCO-CF was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (200, 400, 800 mg roscovitine, orally administered daily for 4 days/week/4 weeks). RESULTS: Among the 34 volunteers enrolled, randomization assigned 11/8/8/7 to receive the 0 (placebo)/ 200/400/800 mg roscovitine doses, respectively. In these subjects with polypharmacy, roscovitine was relatively safe and well-tolerated, with no significant adverse effects (AEs) other than five serious AEs (SAEs) possibly related to roscovitine. Pharmacokinetics of roscovitine were rather variable among subjects. No significant efficacy, at the levels of inflammation, infection, spirometry, sweat chloride, pain and quality of life, was detected in roscovitine-treated groups compared to the placebo-treated group. CONCLUSION: Roscovitine was relatively safe and well-tolerated in CF patients especially at the 200 and 400 mg doses. However, there were 5 subject withdrawals due to SAEs in the roscovitine group and none in the placebo group. The lack of evidence for efficacy of roscovitine (despite encouraging cellular and animal results) may be due to high pharmacokinetics variability, short duration of treatment, and/or inappropriate dosing protocol.

Therapeutic Approaches for Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Not Eligible for Current CFTR Modulators.

Cystic fibrosis is a severe autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene encoding the CFTR protein, a chloride channel expressed in many epithelial cells. New drugs called CFTR modulators aim at restoring the CFTR protein function, and they will benefit many patients with cystic fibrosis in the near future. However, some patients bear rare mutations that are not yet eligible for CFTR modulators, although they might be amenable to these new disease-modifying drugs. Moreover, more than 10% of CFTR mutations do not produce any CFTR protein for CFTR modulators to act upon. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of different approaches pursued to treat patients bearing mutations ineligible for CFTR modulators. One approach is to broaden the numbers of mutations eligible for CFTR modulators. This requires developing strategies to evaluate drugs in populations bearing very rare genotypes. Other approaches aiming at correcting the CFTR defect develop new mutation-specific or mutation-agnostic therapies for mutations that do not produce a CFTR protein: readthrough agents for nonsense mutations, nucleic acid-based therapies, RNA- or DNA-based, and cell-based therapies. Most of these approaches are in pre-clinical development or, for some of them, early clinical phases. Many hurdles and challenges will have to be solved before they can be safely translated to patients.

Therapeutic pipeline for individuals with cystic fibrosis with mutations nonresponsive to current cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cystic fibrosis is a severe autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) encoding the CFTR protein, a chloride channel expressed in many epithelial cells. New drugs called CFTR modulators aim at restoring the CFTR protein function and they will benefit most of the patients with cystic fibrosis in the near future. However, more than 10% of CFTR mutations do not produce any CFTR protein for CFTR modulators to act upon, and the purpose of this review is to provide an overview of different approaches pursued to treat patients bearing mutations nonresponsive to CFTR modulators. RECENT FINDINGS: These different approaches constitute readthrough agents for nonsense mutations, nucleic acid-based therapies, RNA-based or DNA-based, and cell-based therapies. Some approaches using mRNA or cDNA combined with a delivery vehicle are mutation-agnostic therapies. Other approaches, such as the use of tRNA, antisense oligonucleotides, gene editing or cell-based therapies are mutation-specific therapies. SUMMARY: Most of these approaches are in preclinical development or for some of them, early clinical phases. Many hurdles and challenges will have to be solved before they can be safely translated to patients.

Empire-CF study: A phase 2 clinical trial of leukotriene A4 hydrolase inhibitor acebilustat in adult subjects with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by neutrophilic inflammation in the airways. Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a neutrophil chemoattractant and has been implicated in CF pathogenesis. Acebilustat, a novel, synthetic, small-molecule leukotriene A4 hydrolase inhibitor, reduces LTB4 production. We report findings from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of acebilustat in adult subjects with mild-to-moderate lung disease. METHODS: Subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily acebilustat 50 mg, 100 mg or placebo for 48 weeks, concomitantly with their current therapeutic regimen. Subjects were stratified by use of concomitant CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, baseline percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) 50-75 and >75, and number of pulmonary exacerbations in the past year (1 or >1). Primary endpoints were the change from baseline in ppFEV1 and safety. Secondary endpoints included the rate of pulmonary exacerbations. RESULTS: Overall, 199 subjects were randomized and dosed (acebilustat 50 mg, n=67; acebilustat 100 mg, n=66; placebo, n=66). Baseline demographics and disease profile were well balanced among treatment groups. Acebilustat had no statistically significant effect on the primary endpoint of change in ppFEV1 at week 48 or the secondary endpoint pulmonary exacerbations. There was a trend towards reduced pulmonary exacerbations in subjects receiving acebilustat in pre-specified populations with ppFEV1>75 (35% rate reduction) and those on concomitant CFTR modulator therapy (20% rate reduction). Acebilustat was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Acebilustat did not improve lung function. A trend towards reduced pulmonary exacerbations in subjects with an earlier stage of lung disease suggests a potential effect in this population.

Triple Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis Phe508del-Gating and -Residual Function Genotypes.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor is a small-molecule cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator regimen shown to be efficacious in patients with at least one Phe508del allele, which indicates that this combination can modulate a single Phe508del allele. In patients whose other CFTR allele contains a gating or residual function mutation that is already effectively treated with previous CFTR modulators (ivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor), the potential for additional benefit from restoring Phe508del CFTR protein function is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial involving patients 12 years of age or older with cystic fibrosis and Phe508del-gating or Phe508del-residual function genotypes. After a 4-week run-in period with ivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor, patients were randomly assigned to receive elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor or active control for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the absolute change in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline through week 8 in the elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group. RESULTS: After the run-in period, 132 patients received elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and 126 received active control. Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor resulted in a percentage of predicted FEV1 that was higher by 3.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 4.6) relative to baseline and higher by 3.5 percentage points (95% CI, 2.2 to 4.7) relative to active control and a sweat chloride concentration that was lower by 22.3 mmol per liter (95% CI, 20.2 to 24.5) relative to baseline and lower by 23.1 mmol per liter (95% CI, 20.1 to 26.1) relative to active control (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The change from baseline in the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life) with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor was 10.3 points (95% CI, 8.0 to 12.7) and with active control was 1.6 points (95% CI, -0.8 to 4.1). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups; adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in one patient (elevated aminotransferase level) in the elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group and in two patients (anxiety or depression and pulmonary exacerbation) in the active control group. CONCLUSIONS: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor was efficacious and safe in patients with Phe508del-gating or Phe508del-residual function genotypes and conferred additional benefit relative to previous CFTR modulators. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals; VX18-445-104 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04058353.).

Riociguat for the treatment of Phe508del homozygous adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Riociguat is a first-in-class soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator for which preclinical data suggested improvements in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function. METHODS: This international, multicenter, two-part, Phase II study of riociguat enrolled adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for Phe508del CFTR. Part 1 was a 28-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants not receiving CFTR modulator therapy. Twenty-one participants were randomized 1:2 to placebo or oral riociguat (0.5 mg three times daily [tid] for 14 days, increased to 1.0 mg tid for the subsequent 14 days). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were change in sweat chloride concentration and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1), respectively, from baseline to Day 14 and Day 28 with riociguat compared with placebo. RESULTS: Riociguat did not alter CFTR activity (change in sweat chloride) or lung function (change in ppFEV1) at doses up to 1.0 mg tid after 28 days. The most common drug-related adverse event (AE) was headache occurring in three participants (21%); serious AEs occurred in one participant receiving riociguat (7%) and one participant receiving placebo (14%). This safety profile was consistent with the underlying disease and the known safety of riociguat for its approved indications. CONCLUSIONS: The Rio-CF study was terminated due to lack of efficacy and the changing landscape of CF therapeutic development. The current study⁠, within its limits of a small sample size, did not provide evidence that riociguat could be a valid treatment option for CF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02170025.